• DocumentCode
    2063875
  • Title

    Bridging the gap between human and automated procedure execution

  • Author

    Dalal, K. Michael ; Frank, Jeremy

  • Author_Institution
    Stinger Ghaffarian Technol., Inc., NASA Ames Res. Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    6-13 March 2010
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    11
  • Abstract
    Procedures are a fundamental product used by NASA flight controllers and crew to operate space systems. Procedures are often complex and repetitive, taking operators hours to perform. Standard practice today is to manually create scripts to automate procedures. This process is laborious, error-prone, and inflexible. NASA´s Exploration Technology Development Project (ETDP) is investing in advanced technology designed to improve operations for the Constellation Program, which oversees the creation of the next generation of human spaceflight vehicles. Under this project, NASA has developed technology for creating human-readable procedures, as well as for automating the execution of these procedures in a way that permits the crew to maintain a fine degree of control over the level and extent of the automation. The Procedure Representation Language (PRL) is a language for specifying spacecraft procedures, primarily for display to humans who are responsible for all commanding and decision-making. The Plan Execution Interchange Language (PLEXIL) represents plans for automatic execution, and has been demonstrated on applications ranging from planetary analog drills and surface robots to rotorcraft control. We describe the automated translation from PRL to PLEXIL and how the result provides an effective means to execute procedures under the desired level of automation. We highlight the resulting capability using examples derived from the International Space Station.
  • Keywords
    aerospace control; decision making; helicopters; human-robot interaction; ETDP; NASA flight controllers; PLEXIL; automated procedure execution; constellation program; decision making commandment; exploration technology development project; human procedure execution; human spaceflight vehicles; international space station; operate space systems; rotorcraft control; Automatic control; Control systems; Decision making; Displays; Humans; NASA; Orbital robotics; Robotics and automation; Space technology; Space vehicles;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Aerospace Conference, 2010 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Big Sky, MT
  • ISSN
    1095-323X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3887-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1095-323X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AERO.2010.5446851
  • Filename
    5446851