• DocumentCode
    2064495
  • Title

    Why is a technical baseline important on a non-engineering technical project?

  • Author

    Hardash, Jill A -C

  • Author_Institution
    Booz Allen Hamilton, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    6-13 March 2010
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    8
  • Abstract
    The engineering world understands that a technical baseline is the foundation for success on any major project. This cornerstone of systems development is the official source of critical data that will be used by all project participants, provides the framework for the standard communication language of the project, and most importantly is the reference design where change is identified and controlled over the project lifecycle. Generally a technical baseline includes ground rules and assumptions, a detailed technical description of system characteristics, configuration, quality factors, security, its operational concept, and the risks associated with the system. Often a description of the system´s (or the project´s) milestones, schedule, management strategy, implementation/deployment plan, test strategy, security considerations, and acquisition strategy are also included. Given the nature of these technical inputs, how can a traditional technical baseline be applied to non-engineering projects and still be relevant and useful? The goal of this paper is to demonstrate how the technical baseline concept and procedure was successfully applied to two non-engineering projects at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). These two projects were Acquisition Process Improvement (API) a Lean Six Sigma (LSS) focused project, and Unified Messaging System (UMS) an Information Technology (IT) project transitioning all 7,000 JPL mail client users from Eudora to Microsoft Outlook. These projects were not run by engineers, nor were they highly technical in nature. By implementing a technical baseline on these projects the project architecture, change protocol, and requirements expectations were all defined early and managed throughout the project lifecycles. The benefits realized by using a technical baseline manifested through improved strategic customer communication, customer expectation and change management, an understanding of cost and risk impacts, increased teamwork, and proc- - ess improvement efficiencies. These two project examples and the technical baseline benefits will demonstrate how a familiar engineering tool can be used with a non-engineering team with minor modifications and continue to yield impressive results.
  • Keywords
    project engineering; acquisition process improvement; change management; change protocol; customer communication; customer expectation; non-engineering technical project; project architecture; project lifecycles; requirements expectations; technical baseline; unified messaging system; Communication standards; Communication system control; Communication system security; Control systems; Laboratories; Project management; Propulsion; Q factor; Standards development; System testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Aerospace Conference, 2010 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Big Sky, MT
  • ISSN
    1095-323X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-3887-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1095-323X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/AERO.2010.5446876
  • Filename
    5446876