DocumentCode
2066425
Title
Endpoint naming for space delay / Disruption Tolerant Networking
Author
Clare, Loren ; Burleigh, Scott ; Scott, Keith
Author_Institution
Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Technol., Pasadena, CA, USA
fYear
2010
fDate
6-13 March 2010
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
10
Abstract
Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN) provides solutions to space communication challenges such as disconnections when orbiters lose line-of-sight with landers, long propagation delays over interplanetary links, and other operational constraints.12 DTN is critical to enabling the future space internetworking envisioned by NASA. Interoperability with international partners is essential and standardization is progressing through both the CCSDS and the IETF. The DTN architecture, defined in RFC 4838, "uses a flexible naming scheme (based on Uniform Resource Identifiers [RFC3986]) capable of encapsulating different naming and addressing schemes in the same overall naming syntax." Although DTN was originally conceived with a space focus, as the technology underpinning an Interplanetary Network (IPN), DTN has found increasingly broad application to military networks, wireless sensor networks, village networks, "pocket switched" networks, and peer-to-peer networks. In these latter contexts the generality of the naming structure permits the sophistication of "intentional naming" as recently proposed in Internet Draft draft-pbasu-dtnrg-naming-00. We argue in this paper, however, that when the application domain is limited to the space context a much simplified naming scheme is preferred: names may be essentially tuples (x, y) where x and y are non-negative integers identifying "node number" and "service number". This scheme was demonstrated in the DINET deep space flight experiment, and it is currently implemented on nodes in the NASA DTN Experimental Network (DEN). We discuss the rationale for this constrained naming structure, based on considerations of the space context. Alternative naming schemes may also be accommodated in a space DTN node, but we suggest that this simplified scheme should be the minimal naming mechanism that all space DTN nodes must implement. A recommendation for a node number assignment strategy is offered which is bandwidth-efficient and fair t- - o agencies/centers/projects using space DTN. Such assignments could be made under the auspices of the Space Assigned Numbers Authority (SANA) now being established by the CCSDS.
Keywords
internetworking; satellite communication; DINET deep space flight experiment; DTN architecture; NASA; Space Assigned Numbers Authority; Uniform Resource Identifier; addressing scheme; endpoint naming; flexible naming scheme; intentional naming; interplanetary network; military network; naming syntax; node number assignment; peer-to-peer network; pocket switched network; space DTN node; space communication; space delay tolerant networking; space disruption tolerant networking; space internetworking; village network; wireless sensor network; Context-aware services; Disruption tolerant networking; Internet; Internetworking; NASA; Peer to peer computing; Propagation delay; Space technology; Standardization; Wireless sensor networks;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Aerospace Conference, 2010 IEEE
Conference_Location
Big Sky, MT
ISSN
1095-323X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-3887-7
Electronic_ISBN
1095-323X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/AERO.2010.5446949
Filename
5446949
Link To Document