DocumentCode
2077262
Title
MIMO radar: Snake oil or good idea?
Author
Daum, Fred ; Huang, Jim
Author_Institution
Raytheon, Woburn, MA
fYear
2008
fDate
26-29 Oct. 2008
Firstpage
183
Lastpage
187
Abstract
MIMO communication is theoretically superior to conventional comm. under certain conditions, and MIMO comm. also appears to be practical and cost effective in the real world for some applications. It is natural to suppose that the same is true for MIMO radar, but the situation is not so clear. Researchers claim many advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased array radars (e.g., better detection performance, better angular resolution, better angular measurement accuracy, improved robustness against RFI & ECM & multipath, etc.). We will evaluate such assertions from a system engineering viewpoint. In particular, there are serious tradeoffs of MIMO vs. phased array radars relative to cost, system complexity and risk, considering numerous real world effects that are not included in most theoretical analyses. Moreover, in many cases one can achieve essentially the same radar system improvement with phased array radars using simpler less expensive and less risky algorithms. We evaluate roughly a dozen asserted advantages of MIMO radar relative to phased arrays.
Keywords
MIMO communication; computational complexity; phased array radar; MIMO communication; MIMO radar; phased array radars; system complexity; theoretical analysis; Costs; MIMO; Petroleum; Phase detection; Phase measurement; Phased arrays; Radar detection; Radar measurements; Radiofrequency interference; Robustness;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Signals, Systems and Computers, 2008 42nd Asilomar Conference on
Conference_Location
Pacific Grove, CA
ISSN
1058-6393
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-2940-0
Electronic_ISBN
1058-6393
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ACSSC.2008.5074388
Filename
5074388
Link To Document