DocumentCode :
2078154
Title :
Transformation of the Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram to the Frank vectorcardiogram
Author :
Guldenring, D. ; Finlay, D.D. ; Strauss, David G. ; Galeotti, Loriano ; Nugent, Chris D. ; Donnelly, Mark P. ; Bond, R.R.
Author_Institution :
Comput. Sci. Res. Inst. & the Sch. of Comput. & Math., Univ. of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Jordan
fYear :
2012
fDate :
Aug. 28 2012-Sept. 1 2012
Firstpage :
677
Lastpage :
680
Abstract :
Vectorcardiograpic (VCG) parameters can supplement the diagnostic information of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Nevertheless, the VCG is seldom recorded in modern-day practice. A common approach today is to derive the Frank VCG from the standard 12-lead ECG (distal limb electrode positions). There is, to date no direct method that allows for a transformation from 12-lead ECGs with proximal limb electrode positions (Mason-Likar (ML) 12-lead ECG), to Frank VCGs. In this research, we develop such a transformation (ML2VCG) by means of multivariate linear regression on a training data set of 545 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs that were both extracted surface potential maps (BSPMs). We compare the performance of the ML2VCG method against an alternative approach (2step method) that utilizes two existing transformations that are applied consecutively (ML 12-lead ECG to standard 12-lead ECG and subsequently to Frank VCG). We quantify the performance of ML2VCG and 2 step on an unseen test dataset (181 ML 12-lead ECGs and corresponding Frank VCGs again extracted from BSPMs) through root mean squared error (RMSE) values, calculated over the QRST, between actual and transformed Frank leads. The ML2VCG transformation achieved a reduction of the median RMSE values for leads X (13.9μV; p<;.001), Y (15.1μV; p<;.001) and Z (2.6μV; p=.001) when compared to the 2 step transformation. Our results show that the 2step method may not be optimal when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs. The utilization of the herein developed ML2VCG transformation should thus be considered when transforming ML 12-lead ECGs to Frank VCGs.
Keywords :
bioelectric potentials; biomedical electrodes; electrocardiography; mean square error methods; regression analysis; surface potential; Frank VCG; Frank vectorcardiogram; ML 12-lead ECG; ML2VCG method; ML2VCG transformation; Mason-Likar 12-lead electrocardiogram; QRST; diagnostic information; distal limb electrode position; median RMSE values; multivariate linear regression; proximal limb electrode positions; root mean squared error values; standard 12-lead ECG; surface potential maps; test dataset; training data set; vectorcardiograpic parameters; Electric potential; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Heart; Interpolation; Standards; Vectors; Body Surface Potential Mapping; Databases, Factual; Electrocardiography; Electrodes; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Linear Models; Models, Statistical; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Reference Values; Vectorcardiography;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location :
San Diego, CA
ISSN :
1557-170X
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4119-8
Electronic_ISBN :
1557-170X
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346022
Filename :
6346022
Link To Document :
بازگشت