DocumentCode :
2079996
Title :
Performance robustness comparison of two PID tuning methods
Author :
Li Mingda ; Wang Jing ; Li Donghai
Author_Institution :
Metall. Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. of Sci. & Technol. Beijing, Beijing, China
fYear :
2010
fDate :
29-31 July 2010
Firstpage :
3601
Lastpage :
3605
Abstract :
The PID controller is simple, reliable and easy tuning in various industry fields. The classical gain and phase margin tuning method (GPM) has visual frequency domain indices and better robust than other PID tuning methods. The desired dynamic equation method (DDE) is proposed for unknown models. This two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) controller designing can meet desired setting time, and has physical meaning parameter. Fair comparisons of the two controllers (i.e., GPM and DDE) via the simulation tests on four classical models illustrate that the DDE method has better performance robustness while does not depend on models, and the tuning method is simple. The Monte-Carlo method also has been used to test the time and frequency domain performance robustness.
Keywords :
Monte Carlo methods; robust control; self-adjusting systems; three-term control; Monte-Carlo method; PID controller; desired dynamic equation method; performance robustness comparison; phase margin tuning method; Control systems; Equations; Frequency domain analysis; Mathematical model; Monte Carlo methods; Robustness; Tuning; Desired Dynamic Equation (DDE); Gain and Phase Margin (GPM); Performance Robustness; Tuning Method;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Control Conference (CCC), 2010 29th Chinese
Conference_Location :
Beijing
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-6263-6
Type :
conf
Filename :
5572382
Link To Document :
بازگشت