DocumentCode
2079996
Title
Performance robustness comparison of two PID tuning methods
Author
Li Mingda ; Wang Jing ; Li Donghai
Author_Institution
Metall. Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. of Sci. & Technol. Beijing, Beijing, China
fYear
2010
fDate
29-31 July 2010
Firstpage
3601
Lastpage
3605
Abstract
The PID controller is simple, reliable and easy tuning in various industry fields. The classical gain and phase margin tuning method (GPM) has visual frequency domain indices and better robust than other PID tuning methods. The desired dynamic equation method (DDE) is proposed for unknown models. This two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) controller designing can meet desired setting time, and has physical meaning parameter. Fair comparisons of the two controllers (i.e., GPM and DDE) via the simulation tests on four classical models illustrate that the DDE method has better performance robustness while does not depend on models, and the tuning method is simple. The Monte-Carlo method also has been used to test the time and frequency domain performance robustness.
Keywords
Monte Carlo methods; robust control; self-adjusting systems; three-term control; Monte-Carlo method; PID controller; desired dynamic equation method; performance robustness comparison; phase margin tuning method; Control systems; Equations; Frequency domain analysis; Mathematical model; Monte Carlo methods; Robustness; Tuning; Desired Dynamic Equation (DDE); Gain and Phase Margin (GPM); Performance Robustness; Tuning Method;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Control Conference (CCC), 2010 29th Chinese
Conference_Location
Beijing
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-6263-6
Type
conf
Filename
5572382
Link To Document