• DocumentCode
    2079996
  • Title

    Performance robustness comparison of two PID tuning methods

  • Author

    Li Mingda ; Wang Jing ; Li Donghai

  • Author_Institution
    Metall. Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. of Sci. & Technol. Beijing, Beijing, China
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    29-31 July 2010
  • Firstpage
    3601
  • Lastpage
    3605
  • Abstract
    The PID controller is simple, reliable and easy tuning in various industry fields. The classical gain and phase margin tuning method (GPM) has visual frequency domain indices and better robust than other PID tuning methods. The desired dynamic equation method (DDE) is proposed for unknown models. This two-degree-of-freedom (2-DOF) controller designing can meet desired setting time, and has physical meaning parameter. Fair comparisons of the two controllers (i.e., GPM and DDE) via the simulation tests on four classical models illustrate that the DDE method has better performance robustness while does not depend on models, and the tuning method is simple. The Monte-Carlo method also has been used to test the time and frequency domain performance robustness.
  • Keywords
    Monte Carlo methods; robust control; self-adjusting systems; three-term control; Monte-Carlo method; PID controller; desired dynamic equation method; performance robustness comparison; phase margin tuning method; Control systems; Equations; Frequency domain analysis; Mathematical model; Monte Carlo methods; Robustness; Tuning; Desired Dynamic Equation (DDE); Gain and Phase Margin (GPM); Performance Robustness; Tuning Method;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Control Conference (CCC), 2010 29th Chinese
  • Conference_Location
    Beijing
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-6263-6
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    5572382