• DocumentCode
    2088887
  • Title

    Bulk cement ship and barge unloading systems, which system is best?

  • Author

    Krejci, John

  • Author_Institution
    Fuller Bulk Handling, USA
  • fYear
    2000
  • fDate
    2000
  • Firstpage
    231
  • Lastpage
    240
  • Abstract
    During the 1990s, economic circumstances have encouraged the development of new water based bulk material terminals in many parts of the world. This has become increasingly the case in the USA during the latter part of the 1990s, when cement shortages have caused bulk cement to become one of the major import commodities for many bulk terminals. Because of the physical nature of cement, the process of unloading it from ships or barges can present a major hurdle in the path of the implementation of a cement unloading terminal. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the four unloading systems that are available (mechanical screw unloader, pneumatic unloader, self discharging ships, and grab bucket and hopper unloaders), and to help the reader to better understand which system may work best for their specific application
  • Keywords
    cement industry; cements (building materials); environmental factors; materials handling; power consumption; ships; USA; barge unloading systems; bulk cement ship unloading systems; environmental factors; grab bucket unloaders; hopper unloaders; mechanical screw unloader; pneumatic unloader; power consumption; self discharging ships; water based bulk material terminals; Belts; Boats; Building materials; Cranes; Fasteners; Marine vehicles; Material storage; Pipelines; USA Councils; Vacuum systems;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Cement Industry Technical Conference, 2000 IEEE-IAS/PCA
  • Conference_Location
    Salt Lake City, UT
  • ISSN
    1079-9931
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-5823-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CITCON.2000.848524
  • Filename
    848524