Abstract :
Current availability of numerical tools to evaluate the radiation environment, including directional characteristics of the impinging fluxes, allows performing realistic simulations since the first steps of a mission design. Once the orbit and the attitude have been selected, it is possible to evaluate in a quantitative manner the protection needed by the on-board electronics, taking into account the contribution of the other subsystems (structures, batteries) typical of the spacecraft. Of course, this approach is inherently limited to TID-related problems. However, timely consideration of the shielding needed should enable to save mass by identifying the best possible placement of the devices with respect to the impinging flux. This work proposes a shielding evaluation technique, taking into account both orbital and attitude characteristics, which combines the features of SPENV1S simulation tool (by ESA/B1RA) with an in-house developed software. The introduction of a "complementary shielding function" allows comparison among several possible configurations, enabling also an easy graphical presentation of the results. Differences in shields\´ mass, and therefore mass savings, can be in the order of 10%.
Keywords :
aerospace simulation; atmospheric radioactivity; radiation protection; shielding; space vehicle electronics; B1RA; ESA; SPENV1S simulation tool; TID-related problems; attitude selection; directional characteristics; graphical presentation; impinging fluxes; mass savings; mission design; on-board electronics; orbit selection; radiation environment; shield mass; spacecraft built-in radiation shielding; spacecraft subsystems; Aerospace electronics; Availability; Batteries; Orbits; Performance analysis; Performance evaluation; Protection; Software performance; Software tools; Space vehicles;