• DocumentCode
    2183676
  • Title

    Comparison of normal and harmonic ultrasonic imaging with a multirow array

  • Author

    Keen, Connie ; Gauss, Rod ; Fernandez, Anna ; Trahey, Gregg

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Duke Univ., Durham, NC, USA
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    2002
  • Firstpage
    441
  • Lastpage
    444
  • Abstract
    Harmonic ultrasonic imaging is often qualitatively better in the clinical setting than normal ultrasonic imaging in the same frequency range. One possible factor in the differential image quality is the degree of aberration present in the imaged tissue. This work presents initial results of a quantitative comparison of normal and harmonic imaging in phantoms with aberration. We acquired single element RF data using an 8×128 array in normal (transmit frequency 6.7 MHz) and harmonic (transmit frequency 3.8 MHz) imaging modes. The multirow array allows a finer sampling of the aberrator as compared to a linear array. Estimates of apparent aberrator strength, apparent sound speed, and beam shape are compared for normal and harmonic data. Results demonstrate that the apparent aberration is generally greater for the normal mode than for the harmonic mode.
  • Keywords
    biomedical transducers; biomedical ultrasonics; harmonics; phantoms; ultrasonic transducer arrays; 3.8 MHz; 6.7 MHz; aberration degree present; apparent aberrator strength; apparent sound speed; beam shape; clinical setting; differential image quality; frequency range; harmonic data; harmonic ultrasonic imaging; medical diagnostic imaging; multirow array; normal ultrasonic imaging; Acoustic beams; Biomedical engineering; Biomedical imaging; Frequency; Image sampling; Imaging phantoms; Medical diagnostic imaging; Shape measurement; Ultrasonic imaging; Velocity measurement;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Biomedical Imaging, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7584-X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISBI.2002.1029289
  • Filename
    1029289