DocumentCode
2196021
Title
The fallacy of causal iterative learning control
Author
Goldsmith, Peter B.
Author_Institution
Dept. Mech. & Manuf. Eng., Calgary Univ., Alta., Canada
Volume
5
fYear
2001
fDate
2001
Firstpage
4475
Abstract
The goal of iterative learning control (ILC) is to improve the accuracy of a system that repeatedly follows a reference trajectory. This paper proves that if the ILC law is restricted to causal operators, then the ultimate ILC error can be achieved in a single trial using conventional feedback control. The feedback operator is a known function of the ILC operators alone. Hence, there is no reason to use causal ILC even if the plant is completely unknown. This equivalent feedback exists whether or not the ILC itself includes feedback. The equivalence is proved for nonlinear time-varying systems, except for the case of ILC convergence with zero error, which is proved for linear discrete-time systems
Keywords
discrete time systems; feedback; learning systems; linear systems; nonlinear control systems; time-varying systems; causal iterative learning control; conventional feedback control; linear discrete-time systems; nonlinear time-varying systems; reference trajectory; Control systems; Convergence; Error correction; Feedback control; Frequency domain analysis; Iterative methods; Manufacturing; Nonlinear control systems; Robustness; Time varying systems;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Decision and Control, 2001. Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on
Conference_Location
Orlando, FL
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7061-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/.2001.980907
Filename
980907
Link To Document