• DocumentCode
    2196021
  • Title

    The fallacy of causal iterative learning control

  • Author

    Goldsmith, Peter B.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. Mech. & Manuf. Eng., Calgary Univ., Alta., Canada
  • Volume
    5
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    2001
  • Firstpage
    4475
  • Abstract
    The goal of iterative learning control (ILC) is to improve the accuracy of a system that repeatedly follows a reference trajectory. This paper proves that if the ILC law is restricted to causal operators, then the ultimate ILC error can be achieved in a single trial using conventional feedback control. The feedback operator is a known function of the ILC operators alone. Hence, there is no reason to use causal ILC even if the plant is completely unknown. This equivalent feedback exists whether or not the ILC itself includes feedback. The equivalence is proved for nonlinear time-varying systems, except for the case of ILC convergence with zero error, which is proved for linear discrete-time systems
  • Keywords
    discrete time systems; feedback; learning systems; linear systems; nonlinear control systems; time-varying systems; causal iterative learning control; conventional feedback control; linear discrete-time systems; nonlinear time-varying systems; reference trajectory; Control systems; Convergence; Error correction; Feedback control; Frequency domain analysis; Iterative methods; Manufacturing; Nonlinear control systems; Robustness; Time varying systems;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Decision and Control, 2001. Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7061-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/.2001.980907
  • Filename
    980907