DocumentCode
2196300
Title
The effects of resolution recovery on estimation of binding potential from brain SPECT images
Author
Kijewski, Marie Foley ; Fakhri, Georges El ; Fischman, Alan J. ; Mueller, Stefan P. ; Moore, Stephen C.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Radiol., Brigham & Women´´s Hosp., Boston, MA, USA
Volume
2
fYear
2002
fDate
10-16 Nov. 2002
Firstpage
1314
Abstract
We investigated the effects of resolution recovery and SPECT system sensitivity on performance in estimating binding potential (BP) from dynamic brain SPECT data obtained using I-123-altropane, a dopamine transporter imaging agent. BP is estimated by Fischman´s approach, whereby a gamma variate function is fitted to the difference between striatal and occipital time-activity curves (TAC). The TAC were obtained using an approach published by Huesman (1984), who estimated the activity concentration in a ROI directly from the projection dataset without reconstructing the image. We modified this method by incorporating resolution recovery, using a Metz filter. We simulated dynamic projection datasets of a simple striatal phantom and determined the accuracy and precision of estimation of striatal activity concentration and binding potential, both for current system sensitivity and for the higher sensitivity of a new collimator, presently being manufactured. This collimator is expected to increase sensitivity at the center of the brain by a factor of 3, without degrading resolution. The parameter, P, of the Metz filter, which controls the extent of resolution recovery, was varied from 1 to 105. For estimation of striatal activity concentration, increasing the value of P over this range reduced bias and gradually increased variance. For estimation of BP, however, increasing the value of P beyond 2 (for current sensitivity) and beyond 10 (for increased sensitivity) dramatically increased variance. For estimation of striatal activity, there was a broad minimum in RMSE of ∼12% for P between 7 and 100 at current sensitivity, and ∼10% for P between 10 and 300 for improved sensitivity. For estimation of binding potential, the minimum RMSE was 32% (P=2) for current sensitivity, and 17% (p=7) for improved sensitivity. The differences in the effects of resolution recovery on estimation of binding potential and striatal activity concentration are due to the nonlinear nature of the former task.
Keywords
brain; image resolution; medical image processing; single photon emission computed tomography; Metz filter; binding potential; brain SPECT images; dopamine transporter imaging agent; occipital time-activity curves; resolution recovery; striatal time-activity curves; Biomedical imaging; Collimators; Filters; Hospitals; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Imaging phantoms; Optical imaging; Radiology; Scanning probe microscopy;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7636-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239560
Filename
1239560
Link To Document