• DocumentCode
    2196300
  • Title

    The effects of resolution recovery on estimation of binding potential from brain SPECT images

  • Author

    Kijewski, Marie Foley ; Fakhri, Georges El ; Fischman, Alan J. ; Mueller, Stefan P. ; Moore, Stephen C.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Radiol., Brigham & Women´´s Hosp., Boston, MA, USA
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    10-16 Nov. 2002
  • Firstpage
    1314
  • Abstract
    We investigated the effects of resolution recovery and SPECT system sensitivity on performance in estimating binding potential (BP) from dynamic brain SPECT data obtained using I-123-altropane, a dopamine transporter imaging agent. BP is estimated by Fischman´s approach, whereby a gamma variate function is fitted to the difference between striatal and occipital time-activity curves (TAC). The TAC were obtained using an approach published by Huesman (1984), who estimated the activity concentration in a ROI directly from the projection dataset without reconstructing the image. We modified this method by incorporating resolution recovery, using a Metz filter. We simulated dynamic projection datasets of a simple striatal phantom and determined the accuracy and precision of estimation of striatal activity concentration and binding potential, both for current system sensitivity and for the higher sensitivity of a new collimator, presently being manufactured. This collimator is expected to increase sensitivity at the center of the brain by a factor of 3, without degrading resolution. The parameter, P, of the Metz filter, which controls the extent of resolution recovery, was varied from 1 to 105. For estimation of striatal activity concentration, increasing the value of P over this range reduced bias and gradually increased variance. For estimation of BP, however, increasing the value of P beyond 2 (for current sensitivity) and beyond 10 (for increased sensitivity) dramatically increased variance. For estimation of striatal activity, there was a broad minimum in RMSE of ∼12% for P between 7 and 100 at current sensitivity, and ∼10% for P between 10 and 300 for improved sensitivity. For estimation of binding potential, the minimum RMSE was 32% (P=2) for current sensitivity, and 17% (p=7) for improved sensitivity. The differences in the effects of resolution recovery on estimation of binding potential and striatal activity concentration are due to the nonlinear nature of the former task.
  • Keywords
    brain; image resolution; medical image processing; single photon emission computed tomography; Metz filter; binding potential; brain SPECT images; dopamine transporter imaging agent; occipital time-activity curves; resolution recovery; striatal time-activity curves; Biomedical imaging; Collimators; Filters; Hospitals; Image reconstruction; Image resolution; Imaging phantoms; Optical imaging; Radiology; Scanning probe microscopy;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2002 IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7636-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NSSMIC.2002.1239560
  • Filename
    1239560