Title :
Solving the EEG Forward Problem by FDM and FEM
Author :
Li, Jing ; Yan, Dandan
Author_Institution :
Coll. of Mech. & Electr. Eng., China Jiliang Univ., Hangzhou, China
Abstract :
In this paper, the finite element method (FEM) and the finite difference method (FDM) were compared for the resolution of the 3D isotropic EEG forward problem, from the point of view of computational complexity and accuracy. The effects of dipole eccentricity and grid model size on solution accuracy and efficiency are addressed in the simulations. The present simulation study indicates that the numerical accuracy of FEM is more sensitive to tangential dipoles, while FDM is more sensitive to radial dipoles, and the FEM provides similar computational efficiency as FDM for equivalent number of elements. But the reconstruction of grid model for FEM is more complex than for FDM, especially to reconstruct the realistic head model.
Keywords :
bioelectric potentials; electroencephalography; finite difference methods; finite element analysis; physiological models; 3D isotropic EEG forward problem; FDM; FEM; computational efficiency; electrical conductivity; electrical potential; finite difference method; finite element method; grid model reconstruction; numerical accuracy; radial dipoles; tangential dipoles; three-concentric-sphere head model; Boundary conditions; Brain modeling; Computational modeling; Conductivity; Educational institutions; Electroencephalography; Finite difference methods; Finite element methods; Solid modeling; Voltage;
Conference_Titel :
Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2009. BMEI '09. 2nd International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Tianjin
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4132-7
Electronic_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4134-1
DOI :
10.1109/BMEI.2009.5305773