• DocumentCode
    2214039
  • Title

    Resource allocation: what can engineering do for radiology?

  • Author

    Wells, P.N.T.

  • Author_Institution
    United Bristol Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
  • fYear
    1998
  • fDate
    35964
  • Firstpage
    42491
  • Lastpage
    42492
  • Abstract
    Much of what is perceived to be progress in contemporary medicine, and in radiology in particular, is the result of technical push rather than clinical pull. The technologists devise new instruments at the limit of what is technically feasible and the doctors try them out and, if they think that they are useful they strive to diffuse them through the health care system. Remarkable developments have occurred in radiological technology during the past 40 years. Traditional X-ray imaging using photographic film now has to compete with radionuclide imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, digital radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. What used to be regarded as a soft option for the newly-qualified doctor is now perceived as one of the most challenging and exciting areas of modern medicine. Indeed, there seems to be no limit to the development of ever more advanced imaging instruments and opportunities for new clinical applications in screening, diagnosis, monitoring and intervention
  • Keywords
    reviews; 40 y; clinical pull; computed tomography; contemporary medicine; diagnosis; digital radiography; health care system; instruments; intervention; magnetic resonance imaging; medical progress; monitoring; photographic film; radiological technology; radionuclide imaging; resource allocation; screening; technical push; traditional X-ray imaging; ultrasound;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    iet
  • Conference_Titel
    Ethical Issues in Biomedical Engineering (Ref. No. 1998/283), IEE Colloquium on
  • Conference_Location
    London
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1049/ic:19980433
  • Filename
    707116