• DocumentCode
    2222186
  • Title

    Dynamic benchmarking methodology for quality function deployment

  • Author

    Raharjo, H. ; Brombacher, A.C. ; Kah Hin Chai ; Bergman, B.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Technol. Manage. & Econ., Chalmers Univ. of Technol., Gothenburg, Sweden
  • fYear
    2008
  • fDate
    8-11 Dec. 2008
  • Firstpage
    224
  • Lastpage
    228
  • Abstract
    A competitive advantage, generally, can be gained if a firm produces a product that not only addresses what the customer values most, but also performs better than its competitors in terms of quality, cost, and timeliness. However, these two factors, namely, the customer needs and competitors¿ performance, change over time, and yet most product design processes seem to have oversimplified this fact. This paper aims to address this issue, that is, how the dynamics of these two factors along with their interaction can be integrated into a QFD analysis. This proposed methodology essentially comprises of two novel technical approaches. First, it is the use of an exponential smoothing based forecasting technique to model the trend of the importance rating values and the competitive benchmarking information. Second, it is a strength-weakness-opportunity-threat (SWOT) based competitive weighting scheme, which at the same time serves as a more systematic way to substitute the traditional QFD customer competitive target setting and sales point value determination.
  • Keywords
    product design; quality function deployment; technological forecasting; QFD analysis; competitive weighting scheme; competitor performance; customer competitive target setting; customer needs; dynamic benchmarking methodology; exponential smoothing; forecasting technique; quality function deployment; sales point value determination; strength-weakness-opportunity-threat; Companies; Costs; Economic forecasting; Industrial economics; Marketing and sales; Predictive models; Product design; Quality function deployment; Smoothing methods; Technology management; QFD; customer competitive assessment; forecasting; importance rating;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2008. IEEM 2008. IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Singapore
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2629-4
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-2630-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEEM.2008.4737864
  • Filename
    4737864