• DocumentCode
    2240755
  • Title

    Safe passage through the engineering curriculum: guiding subject experts toward integration of communication instruction and outcomes assessment

  • Author

    Sageev, Pneena ; Bernard, Kathy ; Prieto, Floreal ; Romanowski, Carol

  • Author_Institution
    Buffalo Univ., NY, USA
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    29 Sept.-1 Oct. 2004
  • Firstpage
    139
  • Lastpage
    146
  • Abstract
    Industry demands, crowded curricula, tight budgets, new educational technologies, and accreditation directives are relentlessly pushing engineering educators into unfamiliar - sometimes threatening - new frontiers. Frequently, the guide most qualified to guarantee safe passage across this daunting terrain is the technical communication professional. Experienced technical communicators accustomed to thriving on the chaotic borders between subject experts and users, engineering departments and management, old procedures and new technologies are adept at achieving multi-purpose objectives without compromising core requirements. Recent literature reveals that some of the most effective work in achieving adherence to new accreditation standards is occurring at engineering schools with established technical communication leadership. At the University at Buffalo (UB), the State University of New York for example, our Center for Technical Communication (CTC) is working with representatives from five engineering departments to develop strategies for achieving full integration of technical communication instruction within the engineering curriculum. This work, however, looks beyond instructional approaches to examine how technical communication professionals are guiding the institutionalization of effective engineering communication strategies within engineering curricula. Full integration of this core capability promises significant benefits not only to engineering students and their employers, but also to engineering schools seeking improved content mastery, higher retention rates, and higher competitive ranking.
  • Keywords
    accreditation; computer aided instruction; educational courses; educational technology; engineering education; standards; ABET 2000; Buffalo University; Center for Technical Communication; New York State University; accreditation directives; accreditation standards; communication instruction; crowded curricula; educational technologies; engineering curriculum; engineering departments; engineering education; engineering schools; industry demands; outcomes assessment; technical communication professional; tight budgets; writing instruction; Accreditation; Chaotic communication; Design engineering; Educational institutions; Educational technology; Engineering education; Engineering management; Professional communication; Technology management; Writing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Professional Communication Conference, 2004. IPCC 2004. Proceedings. International
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8467-9
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IPCC.2004.1375288
  • Filename
    1375288