• DocumentCode
    2250795
  • Title

    Designing and implementing an Army capability model

  • Author

    Brinn, Michael W. ; Carpenter, Matthew ; Kamon, Michael ; Pigott, David ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Stokes, Brian

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Syst. Eng., US Mil. Acad., West Point, NY, USA
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    24-25 April 2003
  • Firstpage
    301
  • Lastpage
    305
  • Abstract
    The United States Army is transforming itself from a heavy mechanized force designed for cold war missions to a more mobile objective force tailored to the demands of an asymmetric warfare involving many diverse missions, from peacekeeping to land warfare. The Army Objective Force will be based on rapid mobility, information dominance, and tactical superiority. We developed a decision support tool to assess current Army capabilities and prioritize potential Army programs based on their ability to support future Army capabilities. We used two key documents, The Army Plan (TAP) and the U.S. Army Objective Force White Paper, which identify future Army capabilities and transformation goals. Our decision support tool uses multiple objective decision analysis implemented in Microsoft Access to help our client (the Army staff office responsible for prioritizing Army programs) evaluate Army programs. Each program is evaluated by the future Army capabilities it will provide. The ability to prioritize programs is essential to the Army and, specifically, our client because it helps determine which programs provide the most value for the Army budget. Further, it will give our client the ability to assess the effects of potential changes to both program funding and the transformation goals.
  • Keywords
    decision making; decision support systems; military computing; very large databases; Army Plan; Army capability model; Army program; Army resourcer allocation model; Army staff office; Microsoft Access-based tool; United States Army Objective Force; asymmetric warfare; cold war mission; decision support tool; mobile objective force; objective decision analysis; program funding; tactical superiority; Design engineering; Management training; Organizing; Packaging; Resource management; Systems engineering and theory; Weapons;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2003 IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-9744559-0-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/SIEDS.2003.158039
  • Filename
    1242434