DocumentCode
2250795
Title
Designing and implementing an Army capability model
Author
Brinn, Michael W. ; Carpenter, Matthew ; Kamon, Michael ; Pigott, David ; Parnell, Gregory S. ; Stokes, Brian
Author_Institution
Dept. of Syst. Eng., US Mil. Acad., West Point, NY, USA
fYear
2003
fDate
24-25 April 2003
Firstpage
301
Lastpage
305
Abstract
The United States Army is transforming itself from a heavy mechanized force designed for cold war missions to a more mobile objective force tailored to the demands of an asymmetric warfare involving many diverse missions, from peacekeeping to land warfare. The Army Objective Force will be based on rapid mobility, information dominance, and tactical superiority. We developed a decision support tool to assess current Army capabilities and prioritize potential Army programs based on their ability to support future Army capabilities. We used two key documents, The Army Plan (TAP) and the U.S. Army Objective Force White Paper, which identify future Army capabilities and transformation goals. Our decision support tool uses multiple objective decision analysis implemented in Microsoft Access to help our client (the Army staff office responsible for prioritizing Army programs) evaluate Army programs. Each program is evaluated by the future Army capabilities it will provide. The ability to prioritize programs is essential to the Army and, specifically, our client because it helps determine which programs provide the most value for the Army budget. Further, it will give our client the ability to assess the effects of potential changes to both program funding and the transformation goals.
Keywords
decision making; decision support systems; military computing; very large databases; Army Plan; Army capability model; Army program; Army resourcer allocation model; Army staff office; Microsoft Access-based tool; United States Army Objective Force; asymmetric warfare; cold war mission; decision support tool; mobile objective force; objective decision analysis; program funding; tactical superiority; Design engineering; Management training; Organizing; Packaging; Resource management; Systems engineering and theory; Weapons;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, 2003 IEEE
Print_ISBN
0-9744559-0-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/SIEDS.2003.158039
Filename
1242434
Link To Document