Understanding the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering

In this paper we study the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering. Through a detailed design space exploration, we show that clustering closes the energy efficiency gap between SMT and CMP at equal performance points. Specifically, we show that the energy efficiency of CMP compared to SMT at a given performance decreases from a maximum of 25% in a monolithic processor case to 6% when the processor resources are clustered. By carefully considering floorplans, we show that this is, in part, enabled by the small energy consumption (less than 3%) of the interconnection buses required for clustering, even with SMT. As the gap narrows, we show that the efficiency of SMT versus CMP depends on the contribution of leakage energy: at lower leakage, the CMP tends to be better than the SMT, while the SMT outperforms the CMP at higher leakage levels. We demonstrate these results over a wide range of performance and machine configurations.