DocumentCode
2262125
Title
Two generalized greatest of selection CFAR algorithms
Author
Meng, Xiangwei ; He, You
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electron. Eng., Naval Aeronaut. Eng. Acad., Yanai, China
fYear
2001
fDate
2001
Firstpage
359
Lastpage
362
Abstract
The conventional cell-averaging (CA) CFAR detector gives a minimum loss of detection power in homogeneous background, but it exhibits intolerable rise in false alarm probability during abrupt transitions of clutter power levels and significant degradation in detection probability in the presence of interfering targets. The ordered statistics (OS) CFAR processor may resolve multiple targets quite well, but it lacks effectiveness in preventing excessive false alarms during clutter power transitions and its sample sorting time is too long. Therefore, some algorithms such as OSGO and GOSGO are proposed. The advantage of applying greatest of selection logic lies in controlling the rise of false alarms at clutter edges. If several ordered samples are linearly combined to give the noise power estimation for the leading or lagging sub-window, better detection performance can be made than with a single ordered sample as considered in OSGO. In this paper, two new greatest of CFAR schemes (TMGO and QBWGO) are proposed. They split the reference window into two sub-windows and uses TM or QBW methods to create two local noise power level estimations, the greatest value of them is used to set an adaptive threshold. It is shown that the detection performance of TMGO and QBWGO is superior to that of OSGO both in homogeneous background and multiple targets situations
Keywords
adaptive signal processing; higher order statistics; radar detection; radar interference; radar signal processing; GOSGO; OS-CFAR; OSGO; QBW methods; QBWGO; TM methods; TMGO; adaptive threshold; cell-averaging CFAR detectors; clutter edges; clutter power level transitions; constant false alarm rate algorithms; detection power; detection probability degradation; false alarm probability; greatest of selection logic; homogeneous backgrounds; interfering targets; lagging sub-window; leading sub-window; multiple targets; noise power estimation; ordered samples; ordered statistics CFAR processor; radar detection; sample sorting time; split reference window; Background noise; Clutter; Degradation; Detectors; Logic; Noise level; Probability; Radar detection; Sorting; Statistics;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Radar, 2001 CIE International Conference on, Proceedings
Conference_Location
Beijing
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7000-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICR.2001.984700
Filename
984700
Link To Document