DocumentCode :
2262163
Title :
Simplified metrics for evaluating designs for testability
Author :
Ungar, Louis Y. ; Davidson, Scott
Author_Institution :
A.T.E. Solutions, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
fYear :
2009
fDate :
14-17 Sept. 2009
Firstpage :
293
Lastpage :
298
Abstract :
Design for testability (DFT) evaluation is quite complex and circuit dependent. To simplify the analysis and to apply the methodology more generally to different circuit types and different levels of assembly, we focus our efforts on identifying areas of poor testability. We introduce metrics we call sensitized path oriented testability scoring trade or SPOTS trade, performed at all points where failure modes are to be detected and diagnosed, to spot poor testability. Once the problem is identified early in the design stage, especially when it is correlated with a circuit node and a failure mode, the remedy needed to correct the problem through DFT can be quite practical. SPOTS measures four testability attributes - controllability, distinguishability, test resource costs, and test escapes due to lack of testability. The metrics simplify previous testability techniques, by utilizing sensitized paths to measure circuit controllability. The use of sensitized paths greatly reduces the analysis required, and while it may not offer validation of testability, it succeeds in highlighting areas that lack testability. Controllability metric (CM) provides a number corresponding to the number of steps required to sensitize a path. Distinguishability metric (DM) measures the difficulty of isolating one fault from others. Test resource cost (RC), includes test program set (TPS) development costs and test equipment requirements, and is expressed in monetary currency. Penalty cost (PC) measures in currency the cost incurred for nodes left untested by escaping detection in tests. Associating each of these metrics to failure modes at each node creates a table that reveals where testability problems exist. Designers and testability analysts can work together to resolve them either by altering the fault detection and isolation requirements, improving test resources and/or redesigning the unit under test (UUT). This form of analysis is simpler to use and is applicable to any level of a- ssembly-IC, board or system. It can even be utilized by those procuring commercial off the shelf (COTS) products to compare support costs for competing products.
Keywords :
automatic testing; design for testability; fault diagnosis; integrated circuit testing; IC board assembly; automatic testing; circuit controllability metric; circuit node; commercial off the shelf products; designs for testability evaluation; development costs; distinguishability metric; failure mode; fault detection; penalty cost; sensitized path oriented testability scoring; test equipment; test program set; test resource cost; testability analysts; unit under test; Assembly; Circuit faults; Circuit testing; Controllability; Costs; Delta modulation; Design for testability; Fault detection; Performance evaluation; Test equipment; ATE; DFT; TPS; automatic testing; design for testability; fault coverage; fault isolation; test programming;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
AUTOTESTCON, 2009 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Anaheim, CA
ISSN :
1088-7725
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-4980-4
Electronic_ISBN :
1088-7725
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/AUTEST.2009.5313996
Filename :
5313996
Link To Document :
بازگشت