DocumentCode :
2276543
Title :
A comparison of FAM and CMAC for nonlinear control
Author :
Thammano, Arit ; Dagli, Cihan H.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Eng. Manage., Missouri Univ., Rolla, MO, USA
fYear :
1994
fDate :
26-29 Jun 1994
Firstpage :
1549
Abstract :
This article compares a neural network-based controller, both local and global networks, with fuzzy associative memories (FAM) on a nonlinear problem. CMAC and FAM are chosen as representatives of local generalization networks. CMAC controller is trained off-line, therefore, it can response to the incoming input immediately. CMAC can interpolate its memory and give a reasonable control signal even the input has not been trained on. Backpropagation is picked as a representative of global generalization networks. All three systems are studied on a simple simulated control problem. This preliminary research will be adapted later to control the laser cutting machine. A performance measure that depends on the transient response and the steady state response of the controlled system is used. The results indicate that CMAC and FAM are comparable
Keywords :
backpropagation; cerebellar model arithmetic computers; content-addressable storage; fuzzy control; neural nets; nonlinear control systems; transient response; CMAC; backpropagation; cerebellar model arithmetic computer; fuzzy associative memories; local generalization networks; neural network-based controller; nonlinear control; steady state response; transient response; Associative memory; Backpropagation; Control systems; Fuzzy control; Fuzzy neural networks; Laser beam cutting; Neural networks; Optical control; Steady-state; Transient response;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Fuzzy Systems, 1994. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., Proceedings of the Third IEEE Conference on
Conference_Location :
Orlando, FL
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-1896-X
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/FUZZY.1994.343925
Filename :
343925
Link To Document :
بازگشت