DocumentCode :
2277758
Title :
Trading legibility against implementability in requirement specifications: an experimental assessment
Author :
Jacquot, J.P. ; Valdenaire, A.
Author_Institution :
CNRSCRIN-INRIA Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
fYear :
1995
fDate :
27-29 Mar 1995
Firstpage :
181
Lastpage :
188
Abstract :
Ideally, a requirement specification language should lead to highly readable text while being implementable. Unfortunately, current technology does not offer good support for features which enhance legibility such as elisions, flexible syntaxes, and more generally incomplete texts. GLIDER´s designers have deliberately included those features in the language, thus forbidding some texts to be processed. This study is a rigorous assessment, both qualitative and quantitative, of this decision on the first step of processing: the parsing of terms.
Keywords :
formal specification; grammars; specification languages; GLIDER; elisions; experimental assessment; flexible syntaxes; formal specifications; human factor features; incomplete texts; requirement specifications; rigorous assessment; specification language; term parsing; Context; Formal languages; Formal specifications; Humans; Software design; Software engineering; Specification languages; Typesetting; Usability; Writing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Requirements Engineering, 1995., Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Symposium on
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-7017-7
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISRE.1995.512560
Filename :
512560
Link To Document :
بازگشت