• DocumentCode
    2311144
  • Title

    Inductive vs transductive inference, global vs local models: SVM, TSVM, and SVMT for gene expression classification problems

  • Author

    Pang, Shaoning ; Kasabov, Nikola

  • Author_Institution
    Knowledge Eng. & Discover Res. Inst., Auckland Univ. of Technol., New Zealand
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    25-29 July 2004
  • Firstpage
    1197
  • Abstract
    This paper compares inductive-, versus transductive modeling, and also global-, versus local models with the use of SVM for gene expression classification problems. SVM are used in their three variants - inductive SVM, transductive SVM (TSVM), and SVM tree (SVMT) - the last two techniques being recently introduced by the authors. The problem of gene expression classification is used for illustration and four benchmark data sets are used to compare the different SVM methods. The TSVM outperforms the inductive SVM models applied on a small to medium variable (gene) set and a small to medium sample set, while SVMT is superior when the problem is defined with a large data set, or - a large set of variables (e.g. 7,000 genes, with little or no variable pre-selection).
  • Keywords
    genetics; inference mechanisms; pattern classification; support vector machines; trees (mathematics); SVM tree; gene expression classification problems; inductive SVM models; inductive inference; transductive SVM; transductive inference; transductive modeling; Cancer; Classification tree analysis; Gene expression; Knowledge engineering; Learning systems; Neural networks; Paper technology; Predictive models; Support vector machine classification; Support vector machines;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks, 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on
  • ISSN
    1098-7576
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8359-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IJCNN.2004.1380112
  • Filename
    1380112