• DocumentCode
    2333692
  • Title

    Evidence-based software process recovery: A post-doctoral view

  • Author

    Hindle, Abram

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    25-30 Sept. 2011
  • Firstpage
    562
  • Lastpage
    567
  • Abstract
    Software development processes are often viewed as a panacea for software quality: prescribe a process and a quality project will emerge. Unfortunately this has not been the case, as practitioners are prone to push against processes that they do not perceive as helpful, often much to the dismay of stakeholders such as their managers. Yet practitioners still tend to follow some sort of software development processes regardless of the prescribed processes. Thus if a team wants to recover the software development processes of a project or if team is trying to achieve a certification such as ISO9000 or CMM, the team will be tasked with describing their development processes. Previous research has tended to focus on modifying existing projects in order to extract process related information. In contrast, our approach of software process recovery attempts to analyze software artifacts extracted from software repositories in order to infer the underlying software development processes visible within these software repositories.
  • Keywords
    ISO standards; software quality; ISO9000 certification; evidence-based software process recovery; software artifact; software development process; software quality; software repositories; Collaboration; Data mining; Documentation; Process control; Programming; Software quality;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Software Maintenance (ICSM), 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Williamsburg, VI
  • ISSN
    1063-6773
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-0663-9
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1063-6773
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICSM.2011.6080831
  • Filename
    6080831