DocumentCode
2333692
Title
Evidence-based software process recovery: A post-doctoral view
Author
Hindle, Abram
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
25-30 Sept. 2011
Firstpage
562
Lastpage
567
Abstract
Software development processes are often viewed as a panacea for software quality: prescribe a process and a quality project will emerge. Unfortunately this has not been the case, as practitioners are prone to push against processes that they do not perceive as helpful, often much to the dismay of stakeholders such as their managers. Yet practitioners still tend to follow some sort of software development processes regardless of the prescribed processes. Thus if a team wants to recover the software development processes of a project or if team is trying to achieve a certification such as ISO9000 or CMM, the team will be tasked with describing their development processes. Previous research has tended to focus on modifying existing projects in order to extract process related information. In contrast, our approach of software process recovery attempts to analyze software artifacts extracted from software repositories in order to infer the underlying software development processes visible within these software repositories.
Keywords
ISO standards; software quality; ISO9000 certification; evidence-based software process recovery; software artifact; software development process; software quality; software repositories; Collaboration; Data mining; Documentation; Process control; Programming; Software quality;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Software Maintenance (ICSM), 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on
Conference_Location
Williamsburg, VI
ISSN
1063-6773
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-0663-9
Electronic_ISBN
1063-6773
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICSM.2011.6080831
Filename
6080831
Link To Document