• DocumentCode
    2342932
  • Title

    Comparison of symbol-rate detector and radiometer intercept receiver performances in a nonstationary environment

  • Author

    Reed, David E.

  • Author_Institution
    Q-DOT Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA
  • fYear
    1989
  • fDate
    15-18 Oct 1989
  • Firstpage
    359
  • Abstract
    The performances of radiometer and DMR (delay and multiply receiver) intercept receivers have been compared. Examples showing the detectability of direct sequence spread spectrum versus spreading ratio and noise fluctuation are given. Comparisons are also made between communicator performance and interceptor performance. It is shown that the DMR can give superior performance in an environment with nonstationary interference. This is achieved at the cost of higher complexity at the detector. Some of this performance gain can be nullified if the communicator uses filtering to defeat the DMR. Which detector is most appropriate depends on the target signal and the cost complexity trade
  • Keywords
    interference (signal); radiometers; receivers; signal detection; communicator performance; delay and multiply receiver; direct sequence spread spectrum; filtering; interceptor performance; nonstationary environment; nonstationary interference; radiometer intercept receiver; signal detection; symbol-rate detector; target signal; Costs; Delay; Detectors; Fluctuations; Interference; Performance gain; Radiometry; Signal to noise ratio; Spread spectrum communication; Working environment noise;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Military Communications Conference, 1989. MILCOM '89. Conference Record. Bridging the Gap. Interoperability, Survivability, Security., 1989 IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Boston, MA
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/MILCOM.1989.103954
  • Filename
    103954