• DocumentCode
    2346358
  • Title

    How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper

  • Author

    Wieringa, Roel ; Heerkens, Hans ; Regnell, Björn

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
  • fYear
    2009
  • fDate
    Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 4 2009
  • Firstpage
    361
  • Lastpage
    364
  • Abstract
    Scientific evaluation papers investigate existing problem situations or validate proposed solutions with scientific means, such as by experiment or case study. There is a growing amount of literature about how to report about empirical research in software engineering, but there is still some confusion about the difference between a scientific evaluation paper and other kinds of research papers. This is related to lack of clarity about the relation between empirical research, engineering, and industrial practice. In this minitutorial we give a brief rundown on how to structure a scientific evaluation papers as a special kind of research paper, using experiment reports and case study reports as examples. We give checklists of items that a reader should be able to find in these papers, and sketch the dilemmas that writers and readers of these papers face when applying these checklists.
  • Keywords
    software engineering; empirical research; research papers; scientific evaluation paper; software engineering; Computer science; Conference management; Design engineering; Engineering management; Guidelines; Industrial relations; Mathematical analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Software engineering; Standards; Research methodology; Research reporting; Scientific evaluation papers;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Requirements Engineering Conference, 2009. RE '09. 17th IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Atlanta, GA
  • ISSN
    1090-705X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-0-7695-3761-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/RE.2009.17
  • Filename
    5328494