DocumentCode
2346358
Title
How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper
Author
Wieringa, Roel ; Heerkens, Hans ; Regnell, Björn
Author_Institution
Dept. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
fYear
2009
fDate
Aug. 31 2009-Sept. 4 2009
Firstpage
361
Lastpage
364
Abstract
Scientific evaluation papers investigate existing problem situations or validate proposed solutions with scientific means, such as by experiment or case study. There is a growing amount of literature about how to report about empirical research in software engineering, but there is still some confusion about the difference between a scientific evaluation paper and other kinds of research papers. This is related to lack of clarity about the relation between empirical research, engineering, and industrial practice. In this minitutorial we give a brief rundown on how to structure a scientific evaluation papers as a special kind of research paper, using experiment reports and case study reports as examples. We give checklists of items that a reader should be able to find in these papers, and sketch the dilemmas that writers and readers of these papers face when applying these checklists.
Keywords
software engineering; empirical research; research papers; scientific evaluation paper; software engineering; Computer science; Conference management; Design engineering; Engineering management; Guidelines; Industrial relations; Mathematical analysis; Sensitivity analysis; Software engineering; Standards; Research methodology; Research reporting; Scientific evaluation papers;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Requirements Engineering Conference, 2009. RE '09. 17th IEEE International
Conference_Location
Atlanta, GA
ISSN
1090-705X
Print_ISBN
978-0-7695-3761-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/RE.2009.17
Filename
5328494
Link To Document