DocumentCode :
2362132
Title :
Is it a false alarm?
Author :
Stewart, N.A.
Author_Institution :
Siemens Plessey Syst., Cowes, UK
fYear :
1998
fDate :
35860
Firstpage :
42644
Lastpage :
42648
Abstract :
The term “false alarm” is widely used when discussing radar performance and this leads to the implicit assumption that we all know and agree what is meant by a false alarm and that the term has constant meaning. Other than the simple case of noise, this is however rarely the case. The author suggests that the term “false alarm” does not have a constant meaning but is scenario dependent. For a specific radar on a specific site it may have a different meaning in different parts of the coverage or at different times. Specifying the false alarm rate of a radar is therefore very difficult and proving compliance is almost impossible. Even where specification and compliance are achievable, the relevance to the real world is questionable. In practice, a radar is installed on site and a period of optimisation begins where the user and the designer agree on an acceptable balance between wanted detection and unwanted detection
Keywords :
radar detection; compliance; false alarm; noise; optimisation; radar performance; specification; unwanted detection; wanted detection;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
iet
Conference_Titel :
Specifying and Measuring Performance of Modern Radar Systems (Ref. No. 1998/221), IEE Colloquium on
Conference_Location :
London
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1049/ic:19980152
Filename :
667479
Link To Document :
بازگشت