Title :
A method for the comparison of biomechanical breast models
Author :
Tanner, C. ; Degenhard, A. ; Schnabel, J.A. ; Smith, A. Castellano ; Hayes, C. ; Sonoda, L.I. ; Leach, M.O. ; Hose, D.R. ; Hill, D.L.G. ; Hawkes, D.J.
Author_Institution :
Div. of Radiol. Sci. & Med. Eng., King´´s Coll. London, UK
Abstract :
Biomechanical models of the breast are being developed for a wide range of applications including image alignment tasks to improve diagnosis and therapy monitoring, imaging related studies of the biomechanical properties of lesions, and image guided interventions. In this paper we present a method to evaluate the accuracy with which biomechanical breast models based on finite element methods (FEM) can predict the displacements of tissue within the breast. Our experimental data was obtained by compressing the breast of a volunteer in a controlled manner, and the acquisition of MR images of the breast before and after compression. Non-rigid registration of these two MR volumes together with interactive identification of corresponding landmarks provided an independent estimate of the displacements. In addition, the non-rigid registration provided estimates of the displacements of the surface points (skin points) of the breast. The accuracy of the FEM models was evaluated using all or a subset of these surface displacements as boundary conditions. The influence of pectoral muscle movement on the performance of the FEM models was also investigated. Our initial results indicate that the accurate setting of the boundary conditions is more important than the actual choice of elastic properties in these compression scenarios. With the complete boundary conditions, the displacements agreed to within 2.6 mm for all FEM models on average. Assuming no movement at the posterior or the medial side of the breast, the accuracy of the FEM models deteriorated to worse than 4.6 mm for all models
Keywords :
Young´s modulus; biological tissues; biomechanics; elasticity; image registration; mammography; medical image processing; mesh generation; physiological models; piecewise linear techniques; 2D X-ray projection images; 2D orthogonal slices; MRI; biomechanical breast models; boundary conditions; breast registration tools; diagnosis monitoring; elastic properties; finite element methods; image alignment; image guided interventions; interactive identification; landmarks; lesions; mammography; mesh generation; models comparison method; nonrigid registration; pectoral muscle movement; piecewise linear approximation; skin points; surface points displacement; therapy monitoring; tissue displacements; ultrasound images; Boundary conditions; Breast; Finite element methods; Image coding; Lesions; Medical treatment; Monitoring; Muscles; Predictive models; Skin;
Conference_Titel :
Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis, 2001. MMBIA 2001. IEEE Workshop on
Conference_Location :
Kauai, HI
Print_ISBN :
0-7695-1336-0
DOI :
10.1109/MMBIA.2001.991694