• DocumentCode
    238526
  • Title

    Parallel Systems from 1979 to 2014: 35 Years of Progress?

  • Author

    Shepherd, Roderick

  • Author_Institution
    ex-Inmos-STMicroelectron., Bristol, UK
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    24-27 June 2014
  • Firstpage
    23
  • Lastpage
    23
  • Abstract
    Summary form only given. In 1979 I started working in a world where semiconductor technology was advancing rapidly. The world was expecting that very shortly there would be a chip available which could store 64 kilobits (65,536 bits) of data, and already microprocessor based computers were available at a price where they could be bought by individuals. The semiconductor industry saw that there was great potential in building programmable systems. Most semiconductor companies took a lead from the mainstream computer industry and addressed the integration of conventional processors. The company I joined, Inmos, took a different approach. Inmos believed that a new programmable device, the transputer, could become a building block for electronic systems. A transputer would include a processor, memory and a communication system, allowing many transputers to used together in a programmable parallel system. In 1984, after five years of development, Inmos launched the first transputer product, together with the occam programming language. Occam addressed the (often ignored) problem of how to program a parallel system. In 2014 it would possible to integrate about 10,000 transputers into a single chip but the electronics industry has not progressed in this way, and it does not standardly build massively parallel systems. In this talk I start by looking at the basics of building parallel systems, at Tony Hoares Communicating Sequential Processes and the occam language, and at the Inmos transputer. I compare the simplicity and inexpensiveness of the transputer with the complexity and cost of some component parts of a modern processor. I also look at the reasons why the industry has developed ever more powerful uni-processors rather than parallel processors. I then turn to the state of computing in 2014 and to the challenges we face - the end of Den nard scaling, the slowing of Moores law, and the pressure to reduce power consumption. I make the case that the adoption of new co- puter architectures based on large scale parallelism will enable us to progress past these problems. Finally I speculate on what a new parallel architecture might look like, and in which applications it might first be used.
  • Keywords
    communicating sequential processes; parallel processing; transputers; Dennard scaling; Inmos; Moores law; Tony Hoares communicating sequential processes; computer architectures; mainstream computer industry; microprocessor based computers; occam programming language; parallel architecture; power consumption; programmable device; programmable parallel system; programmable systems; semiconductor companies; semiconductor technology; transputer; uniprocessors; Abstracts; Buildings; Companies; Distributed computing; Educational institutions; Electronics industry; Program processors;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Parallel and Distributed Computing (ISPDC), 2014 IEEE 13th International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Marseilles
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4799-5918-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISPDC.2014.35
  • Filename
    6900196