DocumentCode
2390411
Title
Barriers to transparency: growth, and the growth of corruption
Author
Stodder, James P. ; Schroth, Peter W.
Author_Institution
Lally Sch. of Manage. & Tech., Renssealer-Hartford, Hartford, CT, USA
fYear
2003
fDate
2-4 Nov. 2003
Firstpage
556
Lastpage
560
Abstract
The study of corruption confronts a paradox - why a rationally selfish state has good reason to limit corruption, but may not have the means. "Transparency", or a lack of corruption, cannot be provided by government alone, and is but one of several public goods that require voluntary inputs by households. Education, health, and economic security are also in part "socially produced". Transparency is good for these public goods, the reverse causality also holds: education, health, economic security, and transparency are mutually reinforcing. Anti-corruption programs in developing countries must link with (a) improvements in public infrastructure, and (b) traditional forms of reciprocity enforcement, such as Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAS).
Keywords
economics; government; politics; public administration; public relations; Rotating Savings and Credit Associations; anti-corruption programs; corruption growth; economic security; education; government; health; households; public goods; public infrastructure; reciprocity enforcement; reverse causality; socially produced part; transparency; voluntary inputs; Economic indicators; Educational programs; Government; Humans; Investments; Law; Legal factors; Marine animals; Security;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering Management Conference, 2003. IEMC '03. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8150-5
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEMC.2003.1252335
Filename
1252335
Link To Document