• DocumentCode
    2390411
  • Title

    Barriers to transparency: growth, and the growth of corruption

  • Author

    Stodder, James P. ; Schroth, Peter W.

  • Author_Institution
    Lally Sch. of Manage. & Tech., Renssealer-Hartford, Hartford, CT, USA
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    2-4 Nov. 2003
  • Firstpage
    556
  • Lastpage
    560
  • Abstract
    The study of corruption confronts a paradox - why a rationally selfish state has good reason to limit corruption, but may not have the means. "Transparency", or a lack of corruption, cannot be provided by government alone, and is but one of several public goods that require voluntary inputs by households. Education, health, and economic security are also in part "socially produced". Transparency is good for these public goods, the reverse causality also holds: education, health, economic security, and transparency are mutually reinforcing. Anti-corruption programs in developing countries must link with (a) improvements in public infrastructure, and (b) traditional forms of reciprocity enforcement, such as Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAS).
  • Keywords
    economics; government; politics; public administration; public relations; Rotating Savings and Credit Associations; anti-corruption programs; corruption growth; economic security; education; government; health; households; public goods; public infrastructure; reciprocity enforcement; reverse causality; socially produced part; transparency; voluntary inputs; Economic indicators; Educational programs; Government; Humans; Investments; Law; Legal factors; Marine animals; Security;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering Management Conference, 2003. IEMC '03. Managing Technologically Driven Organizations: The Human Side of Innovation and Change
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8150-5
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMC.2003.1252335
  • Filename
    1252335