DocumentCode
2401560
Title
A comparison of classical, robust, and decentralized control designs for multiple power system stabilizers
Author
Boukarim, George E. ; Wang, Shaopeng ; Chow, Joe H. ; Taranto, Glauco N. ; Martins, Nelson
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. Power Eng., Rensselaer Polytech. Inst., Troy, NY, USA
Volume
2
fYear
2000
fDate
2000
Abstract
Summary form only given as follows. Several control design techniques, namely, the classical phase compensation approach, the μ-synthesis, and a linear matrix inequality technique, are used to coordinate two power system stabilizers to stabilize a 5-machine equivalent of the South/Southeast Brazilian system. The open-loop system has an unstable interarea mode and cannot be stabilized using only one conventional power system stabilizer. Both centralized and decentralized controllers are considered. The different designs are compared and several interesting observations are provided
Keywords
centralised control; control system synthesis; decentralised control; power system control; power system stability; robust control; 5-machine equivalent stabilisation; South/Southeast Brazilian system; centralized controllers; classical control design; decentralized control design; decentralized controllers; linear matrix inequality; micro-synthesis; multiple power system stabilizers; open-loop system; phase compensation; power system stabilizers; robust control design; unstable interarea mode; Centralized control; Control design; Control systems; Distributed control; Linear matrix inequalities; Open loop systems; Power system control; Power systems; Robust control; USA Councils;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000. IEEE
Conference_Location
Seattle, WA
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6420-1
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PESS.2000.867494
Filename
867494
Link To Document