DocumentCode :
2407158
Title :
An empirical analysis of equivalence partitioning, boundary value analysis and random testing
Author :
Reid, Stuart C.
Author_Institution :
R. Mil. Coll. of Sci., Cranfield Univ., Swindon, UK
fYear :
1997
fDate :
5-7 Nov 1997
Firstpage :
64
Lastpage :
73
Abstract :
An experiment comparing the effectiveness of equivalence partitioning (EP), boundary value analysis (BVA) and random testing was performed, based on an operational avionics system of approximately 20000 lines of Ada code. The paper introduces an experimental methodology that considers all possible input values that satisfy a test technique and all possible input values that would cause a module to fail (rather than arbitrarily chosen values from these sets) to determine absolute values for the effectiveness for each test technique. As expected, an implementation of BVA was found to be most effective, with neither EP nor random testing half as effective. The random testing results were surprising, requiring just 8 test cases per module to equal the effectiveness of EP, although somewhere in the region of 50000 random test cases were required to equal the effectiveness of BVA
Keywords :
Ada; aircraft computers; military avionics; military computing; program testing; software metrics; Ada code; BVA; EP; absolute values; arbitrarily chosen values; boundary value analysis; empirical analysis; equivalence partitioning; experimental methodology; input values; operational avionics system; random testing; test cases; test technique; Aerospace electronics; Cause effect analysis; Educational institutions; Failure analysis; Performance analysis; Performance evaluation; Software standards; Software testing; Solids; System testing;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Software Metrics Symposium, 1997. Proceedings., Fourth International
Conference_Location :
Albuquerque, NM
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-8093-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/METRIC.1997.637166
Filename :
637166
Link To Document :
بازگشت