• DocumentCode
    2409557
  • Title

    Assessment of field trials, algorithmic performance, and benefits of the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) conflict probe

  • Author

    Brudnicki, D.J. ; Lindsay, K.S. ; McFarland, A.L.

  • Author_Institution
    Center for Adv. Aviation Syst. Dev., Mitre Corp., McLean, VA, USA
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    1997
  • fDate
    26-30 Oct 1997
  • Firstpage
    9.3
  • Abstract
    In order to respond to rising demands for services from the National Airspace System (NAS), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and The Mitre Corporation´s Center for Advanced Aviation System Development (CAASD) have developed and evaluated a set of en route air traffic control (ATC) decision support capabilities based on many of years of earlier work on the Advanced En Route ATC (AERA) program. The component capabilities-embodied in a prototype referred to as the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET)-include a conflict probe that continuously checks current flight plan trajectories for strategic conflicts, and a Trial Planning function that allows a controller to expeditiously evaluate problem resolutions before they are issued as clearances. These capabilities are intended to provide the flexibility and decision support needed to allow more user preferences to be met while continuing to maintain or enhance today´s level of safety. The URET prototype was deployed to the Indianapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) for field trials in January 1996 and later expanded to include more sectors and to span longer periods of time. In addition, the prototype has been deployed and is being evaluated at the Memphis ARTCC. This paper presents key findings from the field trials and from other related activities
  • Keywords
    air traffic control; decision support systems; ATC; Advanced Aviation System Development; Federal Aviation Administration; Indianapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center; Memphis ARTCC; Mitre; National Airspace System; Trial Planning function; URET prototype; algorithmic performance; algorithmic performance assessment; clearance decision making; conflict probe; decision support; en route air traffic control; field trials; flexibility; flight plan trajectories; planning; strategic conflicts; user request evaluation tool; Air traffic control; Contracts; FAA; Permission; Probes; Prototypes; Trajectory; Transportation; US Government; Warranties;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1997. 16th DASC., AIAA/IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Irvine, CA
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-4150-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/DASC.1997.637321
  • Filename
    637321