• DocumentCode
    2425714
  • Title

    Advocacy work in technical communication: Technical communicators on different sides of the environmental sustainability debate

  • Author

    Dawson, J. A.

  • Author_Institution
    East Carolina University
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    17-19 Oct. 2011
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    2
  • Abstract
    This professional practice paper focuses on a case study of PCS Phosphate and its attempt to expand their mining operation in rural NC. This case study highlights the complex relationship among communicators who designed PCS Phosphate´s activist website advocating for the mine expansion, regulatory writers at the EPA who deemed the mine expansion a threat to the environment, and technical communicators who assisted in drafting the reports produced by the Army Corps of Engineers that ultimately decided the fate of the mine expansion. Since PCS Phosphate did receive their mining permit, this paper provides best practices to designing a corporate activist website based on the seemingly successful activist website of PCS. This paper explores how technical communicators can find themselves on different sides of the environmental sustainability debate.
  • Keywords
    Communities; Companies; Economics; Educational institutions; Green products; Professional communication; Rivers; Advocacy; mining; regulatory writing; sustainability;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2011 IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Cincinnati, OH, USA
  • ISSN
    2158-091X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-61284-780-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087236
  • Filename
    6087236