DocumentCode :
2425714
Title :
Advocacy work in technical communication: Technical communicators on different sides of the environmental sustainability debate
Author :
Dawson, J. A.
Author_Institution :
East Carolina University
fYear :
2011
fDate :
17-19 Oct. 2011
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
2
Abstract :
This professional practice paper focuses on a case study of PCS Phosphate and its attempt to expand their mining operation in rural NC. This case study highlights the complex relationship among communicators who designed PCS Phosphate´s activist website advocating for the mine expansion, regulatory writers at the EPA who deemed the mine expansion a threat to the environment, and technical communicators who assisted in drafting the reports produced by the Army Corps of Engineers that ultimately decided the fate of the mine expansion. Since PCS Phosphate did receive their mining permit, this paper provides best practices to designing a corporate activist website based on the seemingly successful activist website of PCS. This paper explores how technical communicators can find themselves on different sides of the environmental sustainability debate.
Keywords :
Communities; Companies; Economics; Educational institutions; Green products; Professional communication; Rivers; Advocacy; mining; regulatory writing; sustainability;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2011 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Cincinnati, OH, USA
ISSN :
2158-091X
Print_ISBN :
978-1-61284-780-1
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087236
Filename :
6087236
Link To Document :
بازگشت