• DocumentCode
    2435403
  • Title

    Revisiting bug triage and resolution practices

  • Author

    Baysal, Olga ; Holmes, Reid ; Godfrey, Michael W.

  • Author_Institution
    David R. Cheriton Sch. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    5-5 June 2012
  • Firstpage
    29
  • Lastpage
    30
  • Abstract
    Bug triaging is an error-prone, tedious and time-consuming task. However, little qualitative research has been done on the actual use of bug tracking systems, bug triage, and resolution processes. We are planning to conduct a qualitative study to understand the dynamics of bug triage and fixing process, as well as bug reassignments and reopens. We will study interviews conducted with Mozilla Core and Firefox developers to get insights into the primary obstacles developers face during the bug fixing process. Is the triage process flawed? Does bug review slow things down? Does approval takes too long? We will also categorize the main reasons for bug reassignments and reopens. We will then combine results with a quantitative study of Firefox bug reports, focusing on factors related to bug report edits and number of people involved in handling the bug.
  • Keywords
    program debugging; Mozilla core; Mozilla developers; bug fixing process; bug reassignments; bug reopens; bug tracking systems; bug triage; resolution practices; Computer bugs; Educational institutions; Encyclopedias; Fires; Interviews; Software; Sorting;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    User Evaluation for Software Engineering Researchers (USER), 2012
  • Conference_Location
    Zurich
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-1858-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/USER.2012.6226578
  • Filename
    6226578