DocumentCode
2435403
Title
Revisiting bug triage and resolution practices
Author
Baysal, Olga ; Holmes, Reid ; Godfrey, Michael W.
Author_Institution
David R. Cheriton Sch. of Comput. Sci., Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
fYear
2012
fDate
5-5 June 2012
Firstpage
29
Lastpage
30
Abstract
Bug triaging is an error-prone, tedious and time-consuming task. However, little qualitative research has been done on the actual use of bug tracking systems, bug triage, and resolution processes. We are planning to conduct a qualitative study to understand the dynamics of bug triage and fixing process, as well as bug reassignments and reopens. We will study interviews conducted with Mozilla Core and Firefox developers to get insights into the primary obstacles developers face during the bug fixing process. Is the triage process flawed? Does bug review slow things down? Does approval takes too long? We will also categorize the main reasons for bug reassignments and reopens. We will then combine results with a quantitative study of Firefox bug reports, focusing on factors related to bug report edits and number of people involved in handling the bug.
Keywords
program debugging; Mozilla core; Mozilla developers; bug fixing process; bug reassignments; bug reopens; bug tracking systems; bug triage; resolution practices; Computer bugs; Educational institutions; Encyclopedias; Fires; Interviews; Software; Sorting;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
User Evaluation for Software Engineering Researchers (USER), 2012
Conference_Location
Zurich
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-1858-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/USER.2012.6226578
Filename
6226578
Link To Document