• DocumentCode
    2451255
  • Title

    Panel 9 - diagnostics vs failure analysis

  • Author

    Bartenstein, Thomas W.

  • Author_Institution
    Cadence Design Inc., Endicott, NY, USA
  • fYear
    2004
  • fDate
    26-28 Oct. 2004
  • Firstpage
    1439
  • Abstract
    This work discusses about the opportunity for diagnostic tools and physical failure analysis. The failure of chip, cause for the failure, and its diagnostics are also focused. The diagnostic tools attempt to isolate the cause for the failure to a small enough area to enable identification of the physical defect that caused the chip to fail. Diagnostic tools typically work in a logic model environment. Existing ATPG technology is used to generate a test pattern that exercises a specific net repeatedly and quickly to enable data collection by a photon emission tool. This work also discusses about the virtual failure analysis, which has the capability to identify defects on failing die without the PFA lab, through the use of inline defect data, and whatever other means are possible.
  • Keywords
    automatic test pattern generation; failure analysis; fault diagnosis; integrated circuit testing; logic testing; ATPG technology; chip defect identification; chip failure; data collection; diagnostic tools; inline defect data; logic model environment; photon emission tool; physical failure analysis; virtual failure analysis; Costs; Design engineering; Environmental economics; Failure analysis; Hardware; Maintenance engineering; Manufacturing; Production; Silicon; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Test Conference, 2004. Proceedings. ITC 2004. International
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8580-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEST.2004.1387447
  • Filename
    1387447