DocumentCode
2451255
Title
Panel 9 - diagnostics vs failure analysis
Author
Bartenstein, Thomas W.
Author_Institution
Cadence Design Inc., Endicott, NY, USA
fYear
2004
fDate
26-28 Oct. 2004
Firstpage
1439
Abstract
This work discusses about the opportunity for diagnostic tools and physical failure analysis. The failure of chip, cause for the failure, and its diagnostics are also focused. The diagnostic tools attempt to isolate the cause for the failure to a small enough area to enable identification of the physical defect that caused the chip to fail. Diagnostic tools typically work in a logic model environment. Existing ATPG technology is used to generate a test pattern that exercises a specific net repeatedly and quickly to enable data collection by a photon emission tool. This work also discusses about the virtual failure analysis, which has the capability to identify defects on failing die without the PFA lab, through the use of inline defect data, and whatever other means are possible.
Keywords
automatic test pattern generation; failure analysis; fault diagnosis; integrated circuit testing; logic testing; ATPG technology; chip defect identification; chip failure; data collection; diagnostic tools; inline defect data; logic model environment; photon emission tool; physical failure analysis; virtual failure analysis; Costs; Design engineering; Environmental economics; Failure analysis; Hardware; Maintenance engineering; Manufacturing; Production; Silicon; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Test Conference, 2004. Proceedings. ITC 2004. International
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8580-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/TEST.2004.1387447
Filename
1387447
Link To Document