DocumentCode :
24536
Title :
Is There a Preferred Classifier for Operational Thematic Mapping?
Author :
Richards, J.A. ; Kingsbury, N.G.
Author_Institution :
Res. Sch. of Eng., Australian Nat. Univ., Canberra, ACT, Australia
Volume :
52
Issue :
5
fYear :
2014
fDate :
May-14
Firstpage :
2715
Lastpage :
2725
Abstract :
The importance of properly exploiting a classifier´s inherent geometric characteristics when developing a classification methodology is emphasized as a prerequisite to achieving near optimal performance when carrying out thematic mapping. When used properly, it is argued that the long-standing maximum likelihood approach and the more recent support vector machine can perform comparably. Both contain the flexibility to segment the spectral domain in such a manner as to match inherent class separations in the data, as do most reasonable classifiers. The choice of which classifier to use in practice is determined largely by preference and related considerations, such as ease of training, multiclass capabilities, and classification cost.
Keywords :
geophysical image processing; image classification; image segmentation; maximum likelihood estimation; support vector machines; classification methodology; flexibility; inherent geometric characteristics; maximum likelihood approach; operational thematic mapping; optimal performance; spectral domain segmentation; support vector machine; Classification; maximum likelihood classifier (MLC); neural network; support vector machine (SVM); thematic mapping;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0196-2892
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TGRS.2013.2264831
Filename :
6553231
Link To Document :
بازگشت