Dependency modelling pitfalls

Author

Simpson, William R. ; Sheppard, John W.

Author_Institution

Inst. for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA, USA

fYear

1994

fDate

20-22 Sep 1994

Firstpage

717

Lastpage

720

Abstract

Model based diagnostic systems are becoming quite popular partially because of the large number of successful applications. Many tools exist for the use of the model based approach, each with a diagnostic advisor. However, experience at modeling over 250 systems has shown that the process of modelling is not straight forward and requires a number of considerations not generally dealt with in the literature. Since the modelling process involves some aspects of art and some aspects of science, the ability to model incorrectly and obtain inaccurate answers is great. This is especially true in the area of automated model development where the concept of a test may be improperly or poorly defined. Some of the more subtle nuances of the modelling approach are discussed and illustrative examples to demonstrate these subtleties are presented

Keywords

automatic test equipment; design for testability; failure analysis; logic testing; BIT; automated model development; logic testing; model based diagnostic systems; testability; Adaptive systems; Art; Artificial intelligence; Automatic testing; Electronic mail; Fault detection; Information analysis; Logic testing; System testing; Weapons;

fLanguage

English

Publisher

ieee

Conference_Titel

AUTOTESTCON '94. IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference. 'Cost Effective Support Into the Next Century', Conference Proceedings.

Conference_Location

Anaheim, CA

Print_ISBN

0-7803-1910-9

Type

conf

DOI

10.1109/AUTEST.1994.381546

Filename

381546