DocumentCode :
2537029
Title :
Arguments against Individual Accounts in China´s Basic Pension System: The Comparison between Financial Defined Contribution and Notional Defined Contribution
Author :
Liu, Fang ; Weng, Xiaodan
Author_Institution :
Finance Sch., Shanghai Inst. of Foreign Trade, Shanghai, China
fYear :
2012
fDate :
12-14 Oct. 2012
Firstpage :
55
Lastpage :
58
Abstract :
In recent years, China´s basic pension system which is the combination of social pooling and individual account has faced with problems such as empty individual accounts, low investment returns and weakness of incentive mechanism, etc. The advent of notional defined contribution provides a new thought for the reform of basic pension system in dilemma. In this paper, transaction costs, investment return and incentive mechanism between financial defined contribution and notional defined contribution are compared. The analysis shows that notional defined contribution is more feasible. The schedule for further reform which is feasible in short-term and sustainable in long-term should be decided with full consideration, sufficient argumentation and detailed measurement.
Keywords :
incentive schemes; investment; pensions; social sciences; China basic pension system; financial defined contribution; incentive mechanism; investment return; low investment returns; notional defined contribution; social pooling; transaction costs; Educational institutions; Finance; Investments; Local government; Pensions; Safety; basic pension system; empty accounts; financial defined contribution; individual account; notional defined contribution;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN), 2012 Second International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Shanghai
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-4469-2
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/BCGIN.2012.21
Filename :
6382462
Link To Document :
بازگشت