DocumentCode
2540597
Title
A comparison of 4X InfiniBand and Quadrics Elan-4 technologies
Author
Brightwell, Ron ; Doerfler, Douglas ; Underwood, Keith D.
Author_Institution
Sandia Nat. Labs., Sandia Corp., Albuquerque, NM, USA
fYear
2004
fDate
20-23 Sept. 2004
Firstpage
193
Lastpage
204
Abstract
Quadrics Elan-4 and 4X InfiniBand have comparable performance in terms of peak bandwidth and ping-pong latency. In contrast, the two network architectures differ dramatically in details ranging from signaling technologies to programming interface design to software stacks. Both networks compete in the high performance computing marketplace, and InfiniBand is currently receiving a significant amount of attention, due mostly to its potential cost/performance advantage. This work compares 4X InfiniBand and Quadrics Elan-4 on identical compute hardware using application benchmarks of importance to the DOE community. We use scaling efficiency as the main performance metric, and we also provide a cost analysis for different network configurations. Although our 32-node test platform is relatively small, some scaling issues are evident. In general, the Quadrics hardware scales slightly better on most of the applications tested.
Keywords
benchmark testing; multiprocessor interconnection networks; network interfaces; performance evaluation; workstation clusters; 32-node test platform; 4X InfiniBand; Quadrics Elan-4; application benchmarks; cost analysis; high performance computing; interface design; network architectures; network configurations; peak bandwidth; performance metric; ping-pong latency; signaling technologies; software stacks; Bandwidth; Computer applications; Computer architecture; Costs; Delay; Hardware; High performance computing; Signal design; Software design; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Cluster Computing, 2004 IEEE International Conference on
ISSN
1552-5244
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8694-9
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CLUSTR.2004.1392617
Filename
1392617
Link To Document