DocumentCode
2559283
Title
Comparisons motion correction methods for PET studies
Author
Hong, Injoon ; Burbar, Ziad ; Michel, Cotsaftis
Author_Institution
Siemens Healthcare, Knoxville, TN, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
Oct. 27 2012-Nov. 3 2012
Firstpage
3293
Lastpage
3294
Abstract
Motion in PET studies degrades the image quality and introduces bias which is critical for high resolution scanners such as mCT, mMR, and HRRT. There are many publications related to motion correction in PET. They consider either Rigid-body or Non Rigid-body motion and use three methods for motion correction. In this work we will describe and compare three motion correction methods. The first method performs motion correction in image space, while the second method performs motion correction in sinogram (or LOR) space and then reconstruct the motion corrected sinogram. The third method performs motion correction during the reconstruction process. Amongst the three methods, one should be selected depending on the amount of motion, the selected isotope, and the application: brain, cardiac, or whole body. In this work, three rigid body motion correction methods are compared for brain application.
Keywords
brain; cardiology; image motion analysis; image reconstruction; image resolution; medical image processing; positron emission tomography; HRRT; PET; brain application; cardiac, application; high resolution scanners; image quality; image space; mCT; mMR; motion corrected sinogram; nonrigid-body motion; reconstruction process; rigid body motion correction methods; sinogram space; whole body application;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2012 IEEE
Conference_Location
Anaheim, CA
ISSN
1082-3654
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-2028-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551750
Filename
6551750
Link To Document