• DocumentCode
    2561941
  • Title

    A comparison of audio and tactile displays for non-visual target selection tasks

  • Author

    Charoenchaimonkon, Eakachai ; Janecek, Paul ; Dailey, Matthew N. ; Suchato, Atiwong

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci. & Inf. Manage., AIT, Pathumthani, Thailand
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    13-15 Dec. 2010
  • Firstpage
    238
  • Lastpage
    243
  • Abstract
    This paper presents the results of a series of three experiments carried out to evaluate the speed and accuracy of target acquisition tasks using visual, auditory, or tactile feedback modalities. Ten participants conducted a series of 1-D and 2-D pointing tasks using a pen-based input device and either visual, audio or tactile (vibratory) feedback. Fitts´ Law was used to analyze the results. Overall, participants generally performed better with tactile displays than auditory displays, and were able to perform 1-D pointing tasks with auditory and tactile displays nearly as well as with visual displays. However, pointing in 2-D is significantly slower and more error-prone with non-visual displays.
  • Keywords
    auditory displays; graphical user interfaces; haptic interfaces; 1D pointing task; 2D pointing task; Fitts´ law; GUI; accuracy evaluation; auditory displays; auditory modality; nonvisual target selection task; pen-based input device; speed evaluation; tactile display; tactile feedback modality; target acquisition task; visual display; visual modality; Data visualization; Graphical user interfaces; Haptic interfaces; Indexes; Mice; Tactile sensors; Visualization; Auditory system; Tactile displays; Testing; User interfaces;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2010 International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Shah Alam
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-9048-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716759
  • Filename
    5716759