DocumentCode
2566300
Title
Batteries for stationary standby and for stationary cycling applications part 1: standby vs. cycling - definitions and concepts
Author
Hammond, R.L. ; Everingham, Spencer ; Srinivasan, Devarajan
Author_Institution
Arizona State Univ.Concepts, Prescott, AZ, USA
Volume
1
fYear
2003
fDate
13-17 July 2003
Abstract
This paper is introductory and provides a basis for understanding the fundamental differences between the two primary applications of stationary lead-acid batteries: standby and cycling. It sets the baseline for the use of the terminology, standby (not stationary) vs. cycling, power vs. energy, and charging efficiency. Application requirements define the need for fundamentally different designs and construction for power batteries and energy batteries. A typical stand-alone remote home application is used as an example to graphically illustrate daily cycling characteristics. Factors that typically limit battery life for standby and cycling batteries are discussed. Finally, available standards for cycling applications (SCC21) and standby applications (PES/SB-SCC29) are discussed.
Keywords
battery management systems; battery storage plants; emergency power supply; energy storage; lead acid batteries; PES/SB-SCC29; SCC21; battery life; charging efficiency; daily cycling characteristics; energy batteries; lead-acid batteries; power batteries; stand-alone remote home application; stationary cycling applications; stationary standby batteries; Batteries; Density estimation robust algorithm; Dictionaries; Emergency power supplies; Energy storage; Fault location; Photovoltaic systems; Power systems; Terminology; Uninterruptible power systems;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2003, IEEE
Print_ISBN
0-7803-7989-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/PES.2003.1267155
Filename
1267155
Link To Document