• DocumentCode
    2566300
  • Title

    Batteries for stationary standby and for stationary cycling applications part 1: standby vs. cycling - definitions and concepts

  • Author

    Hammond, R.L. ; Everingham, Spencer ; Srinivasan, Devarajan

  • Author_Institution
    Arizona State Univ.Concepts, Prescott, AZ, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    13-17 July 2003
  • Abstract
    This paper is introductory and provides a basis for understanding the fundamental differences between the two primary applications of stationary lead-acid batteries: standby and cycling. It sets the baseline for the use of the terminology, standby (not stationary) vs. cycling, power vs. energy, and charging efficiency. Application requirements define the need for fundamentally different designs and construction for power batteries and energy batteries. A typical stand-alone remote home application is used as an example to graphically illustrate daily cycling characteristics. Factors that typically limit battery life for standby and cycling batteries are discussed. Finally, available standards for cycling applications (SCC21) and standby applications (PES/SB-SCC29) are discussed.
  • Keywords
    battery management systems; battery storage plants; emergency power supply; energy storage; lead acid batteries; PES/SB-SCC29; SCC21; battery life; charging efficiency; daily cycling characteristics; energy batteries; lead-acid batteries; power batteries; stand-alone remote home application; stationary cycling applications; stationary standby batteries; Batteries; Density estimation robust algorithm; Dictionaries; Emergency power supplies; Energy storage; Fault location; Photovoltaic systems; Power systems; Terminology; Uninterruptible power systems;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2003, IEEE
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7989-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PES.2003.1267155
  • Filename
    1267155