Title :
The effect of blood pressure variability on the estimation of the systolic and diastolic pressures
Author :
Soueidan, Karen ; Chen, Silu ; Dajani, Hilmi R. ; Bolic, Miodrag ; Groza, Voicu
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Inf. Technol. & Eng., Univ. of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
fDate :
April 30 2010-May 1 2010
Abstract :
Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure are two parameters that are widely used in clinical and personal health monitoring and that are subject to significant physiological variability. The estimation of SBP and DBP is therefore subject to two sources of uncertainty: 1) measurement error, and 2) physiological variability. According to the ANSI/AAMI SP10 standard, the measurement error of an automated sphygmomanometer is limited to ±5 mmHg relative to simultaneous reference readings by at least two trained observers employing a calibrated manometer. In order to directly compare the contributions of physiological variability and measurement error to SBP and DBP estimation uncertainty, we analyzed continuous short recordings of arterial pulses (<; 5 min) and calculated the percentage of beats in which the SBP and DBP exceeds ±5 mmHg relative to the mean value in the analyzed interval. In a group of ICU patients, this percentage was 33.0% for SBP and 14.9% for DBP on average, while in a group of healthy individuals this percentage was 27.5% for SBP and 17.8% for DBP on average. True outliers occurred in 5.17% of the SBP and 12.2% of the DBP values in ICU patients, and 3.27% of the SBP and 3.63% of the DBP values in healthy individuals. These results indicate that blood pressure variability is an important contributor to SBP and DBP estimation uncertainty, and devices that intelligently determine the best time to initiate a recording and the frequency of recordings may alleviate this uncertainty.
Keywords :
blood pressure measurement; blood vessels; indeterminancy; measurement errors; ANSI-AAMI SP10 standard; arterial pulses; blood pressure measurement; blood pressure variability; diastolic pressures; estimation uncertainty; measurement error; sphygmomanometer; systolic blood pressure; ANSI standards; Biomedical monitoring; Blood pressure; Blood pressure variability; Condition monitoring; Frequency estimation; Measurement errors; Measurement standards; Pulse measurements; Uncertainty; Blood pressure measurement; blood pressure variability; health monitoring; measurement uncertainty;
Conference_Titel :
Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings (MeMeA), 2010 IEEE International Workshop on
Conference_Location :
Ottawa, ON
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4244-6288-9
DOI :
10.1109/MEMEA.2010.5480215