DocumentCode
2591351
Title
Notice of Retraction
Comparing evaluated precision of straightness error among two spot, least square method and minimum envelope zone method
Author
Shuyao Tian ; Weina Lu ; Hui Tian ; Ning Cai ; Ying Yang
Author_Institution
Dept. of Mech. & Electron., Hebei Normal Univ. of Sci. & Technol., Qinhuangdao, China
Volume
2
fYear
2010
fDate
28-31 Aug. 2010
Firstpage
67
Lastpage
70
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The aim of this paper is to find the evaluate method for straightness error conforms to the smallest condition. First, the algorithm model and the realization method of evaluating straightness error in two spot, least squares method and the minimum envelope zone method have been introduced in detail. The experiment data of eight different kinds of straights have been done on CMM. Then the measured data are evaluated by two spot, least square method and minimum envelope zone method based on search approximatioss(namely cut and try method in revolutionally). It´s the experimental result indicated that minimum envelope zone method based on search approximatioss evaluates the result precision to be the highest, and conform to the smallest condition. the sampling distribution impacts the evaluating precision of two spot and least squares method.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The aim of this paper is to find the evaluate method for straightness error conforms to the smallest condition. First, the algorithm model and the realization method of evaluating straightness error in two spot, least squares method and the minimum envelope zone method have been introduced in detail. The experiment data of eight different kinds of straights have been done on CMM. Then the measured data are evaluated by two spot, least square method and minimum envelope zone method based on search approximatioss(namely cut and try method in revolutionally). It´s the experimental result indicated that minimum envelope zone method based on search approximatioss evaluates the result precision to be the highest, and conform to the smallest condition. the sampling distribution impacts the evaluating precision of two spot and least squares method.
Keywords
coordinate measuring machines; least squares approximations; measurement errors; CMM; alignment error; coordinate measuring machines; least square method; minimum envelope zone method; search approximation; straightness error; Coordinate measuring machines; Least squares approximation; Length measurement; Mathematical model; Measurement uncertainty; MATLAB; least square method; minimum envelope zone method[1]; straightness error;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Geoscience and Remote Sensing (IITA-GRS), 2010 Second IITA International Conference on
Conference_Location
Qingdao
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-8514-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IITA-GRS.2010.5603259
Filename
5603259
Link To Document