Peer & self evaluations as means to improve the assessment of project based learning

Peer and self evaluations are an excellent way to monitor and evaluate group skills in project based design work. Their use has become increasingly popular with increase in popularity of project based learning. Peer evaluations allow faculty to differentiate in individual grading of group work and prevent free-riding. This paper makes a distinction between three types of peer evaluation: ranking students, dividing assets between students and rating students on qualitative criteria. Based on these criteria it compares the system developed at Delft University of Technology with existing systems in Eindhoven (NL) and Sydney (Aus) based on their functionality and cultural dimensions. We also discuss the hurdles faced by all parties in using this tool in grading and how we have overcome them. This results in a clear set of recommendations for lecturers who would like to use peer evaluation in their projects.