DocumentCode
2607068
Title
Bone graft translation of four upper cervical spine fixation techniques in a cadaveric model
Author
Crisco, Joseph J., III ; Panjabi, Manohar M. ; Oda, Takenori ; Grob, Dieter ; Dvorak, Jiri
Author_Institution
Biomech. Lab., Yale Univ. Sch. of Med., New Haven, CT, USA
fYear
1991
fDate
4-5 Apr 1991
Firstpage
229
Lastpage
230
Abstract
The goal of spinal fixation is to promote bony fusion by restricting motion at the site of the bone graft. In order to evaluate the efficiency of various cervical fixation techniques, the authors determined the translations at the posterior arch of C1 for four C1 -C2 posterior techniques: Gallie, Brooks, Mageri, and Halifax. The authors assumed that translational laxity is the critical motion parameter and evaluated this parameter, quantified herein as the neutral zone, at seven points at the graft site. The authors found that there was no significant difference with the fixation techniques in the average axial translation. In shear, the Mageri averaged 1 mm which was significantly less than the Gallie (2.1 mm). The authors propose that evaluation by translational laxity (neutral zone) at the graft site is a noteworthy concept in biomechanical analysis
Keywords
biomechanics; bone; surgery; Brooks; Gallie; Halifax; Mageri; biomechanical analysis; cadaveric model; critical motion parameter; shear; translational laxity; upper cervical spine fixation techniques; Biomechanics; Bones; Humans; Instruments; Laboratories; Orthopedic surgery; Plastics; Protocols; Stability; Testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Bioengineering Conference, 1991., Proceedings of the 1991 IEEE Seventeenth Annual Northeast
Conference_Location
Hartford, CT
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0030-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/NEBC.1991.154658
Filename
154658
Link To Document