DocumentCode
2670931
Title
Cable Ampacity Calculations: A Comparison of Methods
Author
Bates, Carson ; Malmedal, Keith ; Cain, David
Author_Institution
NEI Electr. Power Eng., Arvada, CO, USA
fYear
2015
fDate
19-21 April 2015
Firstpage
81
Lastpage
87
Abstract
When designing electrical power systems, it is often necessary to determine underground cable ampacity. Various methods are in use today including computer simulation, ampacity tables, and a method that has recently been suggested that includes the effects of moisture migration through soil. Each of these methods can yield substantially different ampacity results for the same installation. Regardless of the method, using the correct value of soil thermal resistivity is critical and using the wrong value can result in cables that are incorrectly sized. This paper examines several commonly used methods and their underlying assumptions. Examples are provided to illustrate the differences in the results obtained from various methods and the consequences of using incorrect assumptions. It is hoped that these examples will provide guidance on the implementation of each method.
Keywords
power cables; soil; thermal conductivity; underground cables; ampacity tables; computer simulation; electrical power systems; moisture migration; soil thermal resistivity; underground cable ampacity calculations; Cable shielding; Conductivity; Moisture; Power cables; Soil; Thermal resistance; Water heating; cable ampacity; power cable installation; power distribution; soil thermal resistivity; soil thermal stability; solar power generation; underground power distribution lines; underground power transmission lines; wind power generation;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC), 2015 IEEE
Conference_Location
Asheville, NC
ISSN
0734-7464
Print_ISBN
978-1-4799-7555-6
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/REPC.2015.13
Filename
7106314
Link To Document