A taxonomy of branch mispredictions, and alloyed prediction as a robust solution to wrong-history mispredictions

The need for accurate conditional-branch prediction is well known: mispredictions waste large numbers of cycles, inhibit out-of-order execution, and waste power on mis-speculated computation. Prior work on branch-predictor organization has focused mainly on how to reduce conflicts in the branch-predictor structures, while relatively little work has explored other causes of mispredictions. Some prior work has identified other categories of mispredictions, but this paper organizes these categories into a broad taxonomy of misprediction types. Using the taxonomy, this paper goes on to show that other categories- especially wrong history mispredictions-are often more important than conflicts. This is true even if just a very simple conflict-reduction technique is used. Based on these observations, this paper proposes alloying local and global history together in a two-level branch predictor structure. This simple technique, a generalization of the bi-mode predictor, attacks wrong-history mispredictions by making both global and local history simultaneously available. Unlike bi-mode prediction, however, alloying gives robust performance for branch-predictor hardware budgets ranging from very large to very small. Finally, this paper shows that individual branch references can also suffer wrong-history mispredictions as they alternate between using global and local history, a phenomenon that favors dynamic rather than static selection in hybrid predictors