• DocumentCode
    2686278
  • Title

    The Comparison between Chemical Spectrophotometry and Instrument Method to Determine the Formaldehyde Concentration of the Indoor Air

  • Author

    Jin Shu-Guang ; Wang Hong-yan ; Li Huan ; Liu Hui-Ying

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Public Health, Beihua Univ., Jilin, China
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    28-30 May 2012
  • Firstpage
    1787
  • Lastpage
    1790
  • Abstract
    To detect the accuracy of measurement results with Z300P portable formaldehyde analyzer, and provide scientific data for detecting formaldehyde concentration in the air using instrument instead of chemical method, the different formaldehyde concentration was detected by phenol reagent and acetyl acetone which are the national standard method for the formaldehyde concentrations determination in indoor air and their precision test and linear analysis were done. At the same time, the formaldehyde of low, medium and high concentrations of in different indoor field was detected with Z300P portable formaldehyde analyzer, then significant difference test among the results was done. The average relative standard deviation of measurement results through phenol reagent and acetyl acetone national standard method was less than 5%, there is a good linear relationship (r >; 0.997).There was no significant difference (P >; 0.05) indifferent formaldehyde concentrations results through phenol reagent with acetyl acetone method. But there was a significant difference (P <; 0.05) among the determination results coming from the chemical and instrument method. When Measurement results with phenol reagent was regarded as the "true value", the accuracy of the results in low, medium and high concentration with instrument method were 37.5%, 70% and 80%. There is a high precision and good reproducibility existing in Phenol reagent and acetyl acetone method. The measurement results using them can be used as calibration "true value." of other methods. The results with Z300P portable formaldehyde analyzer of this institute have been inaccurate. It needs maintenance and calibration, but it can also be used to rough detect airborne formaldehyde content in emergency by calibration coefficients.
  • Keywords
    air pollution measurement; calibration; electrochemical sensors; health hazards; indoor environment; portable instruments; spectrochemical analysis; spectrophotometry; Z300P portable formaldehyde analyzer; acetyl acetone; airborne formaldehyde content; calibration true value; chemical spectrophotometry; formaldehyde concentration; indoor air; instrument method; national standard method; phenol reagent; scientific data; Absorption; Calibration; Chemicals; Instruments; Linear regression; Pollution measurement; Standards; Instrumental method; chemical method; formaldehyde; indoor air;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Biomedical Engineering and Biotechnology (iCBEB), 2012 International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Macau, Macao
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-1987-5
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/iCBEB.2012.403
  • Filename
    6245488