• DocumentCode
    2720064
  • Title

    Detailed Control Room Design Reviews-were they worth the effort?

  • Author

    Feher, Mark P.

  • Author_Institution
    Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., Chalk River, Ont., Canada
  • fYear
    1997
  • fDate
    8-13 Jun 1997
  • Firstpage
    42451
  • Lastpage
    42455
  • Abstract
    In order to consider the issue of the Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) it is appropriate to pose a series of questions to provide context and a framework to the discussion: What was the nature of experience with DCRDRs? What was the general approach taken to perform the work? What were the findings from the work? What resulted from the findings? Was the DCRDR a useful tool? What were the positive factors? What were the negative factors? The author answers these questions with particular reference to CANDU
  • Keywords
    control facilities; nuclear power stations; power station control; CANDU; Detailed Control Room Design Reviews; negative factors; nuclear power stations; positive factors; Alarm systems; Design engineering; Displays; Engineering management; Human factors; Labeling; Management training; Personnel; Process design; Standards development;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Human Factors and Power Plants, 1997. Global Perspectives of Human Factors in Power Generation., Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3769-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/HFPP.1997.624821
  • Filename
    624821